Talk:Oracle RAC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I believe that in addition to the list of "Oracle's competitors" offering a shared nothing architecture include Teradata, at least according to Wikipedia. (I don't have another source to verify this.) --Michael 20:03, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

   Added Teradata, IBM DB2 BCU and Netezza for products of true MPP/SN architecture.

Removed those entries that are SMP clustered.


In the "Competitors" section[edit]

   "Oracle RAC is not the only commercially available database that offers a shared-everything architecture."

Maybe I'm confused, but is this supposed to read shared-nothing? Null Nihils 09:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


I believe you are confused. Many vendors have shared-nothing architectures, but I don't believe many have shared-everything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.152.49.106 (talk) 16:48, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does it access the same or different data files and control files? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.135.50.211 (talk) 04:14, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]