Talk:Ordered exponential

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It would be nice to see a sketch of the derivation, that each method of definition is equivalent to the same thing, and where ordering becomes relevant. Cesiumfrog (talk) 01:52, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is some confusion in the definitions: in the first one t1<t2, in the last one t2<t1... (12:52, 25 January 2011 UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.33.102.156 (talk)

Ambiguous notation[edit]

In the definition formula after "The ordered exponential of a is denoted", it is unclear what each of the upper limits of integrals on the right: t, ?, ?, t'n Chris2crawford (talk) 12:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, thanks for pointing this out Chris2crawford Quantumavik (talk) 14:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]