Talk:Orlestone

The comment this isn't a village, so I'll dump it here for now equally applies to many other civil parishes which are not strictly villages in their own right: for example Boughton Aluph and Eastwell which includes three settlements within its boundaries. They are shown on the lists under the various local government districts - in this case Ashford (district), and are also under the overall listing List of civil parishes in Kent. There is already an article for Hamstreet, but several settlements like Orlestone (which was, after all, once a village in its own right) are included in the Villages in Kent listing. A second point is that according to a note here the villagers moved because there was a better water source at Ham Street. Which is which: water or the railway? The station was for many years called Ham Street and Orlestone Peter Shearan 13:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

I have no problem including it in the villages category. I merely wanted defer the decision and draw the attention of an editor that knows something about civil designations in England; it seems to have worked. Thanks. ×Meegs 15:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Orlestone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091027041339/http://geocities.com/skrzydla/ to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:49, 16 July 2016 (UTC)