Talk:Orthodox Marxism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merging Classical Marxism and Orthodox Marxism[edit]

Somebody placed a merge tag on the Classical Marxism page, but I don't think that there is any reason the merge the well strucutred and developed Classical Marxism article with the Orthodox Marxism tab. The Orthodox Marxism article states that Orthodox Marxism is the version of Marxism which emerged after the death of Karl Marx. This therefore could form a sub-section of the Classical Marxism page. I have therefore switched the tags around to suggest that Orthodox Marxism be merged into Classical Marxism. Although I don't necessarily agree with this I am happy to leave it open to debate. JenLouise (talk) 04:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think they are two different things and should be kept seperate. BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:50, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
where are the quotations for this, wikipedia is propaganda —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.55.122.95 (talk) 04:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes they are two different things but this is the one that ought to have the greater development as it covers more actual stuff (e.g. the Marxist praxis in actual state experiments after the time of M&E). Although the components exist in separate articles there doesn't appear to anything thing corresponding to what this should be. It's practically a stub at this point. Lycurgus (talk) 17:37, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kautsky was a revisinist decended from Bernstein — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.225.200.133 (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kautskyism[edit]

I added some key points from this article:

http://www.cpgb.org.uk/worker/620/macnair.htm

Kjk2.1 (talk) 02:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Rooke quote[edit]

I included a quote from an article by Mike Rooke in the "description" section, as the current entry lacks external sources. An anonymous editor removed it, with the following justification, but I disagree and replaced. If other editors agree with the criticism, fair enough. The anon ed said "the claim lacks citation and the quote is out of context, the article itself differentiates Orthodox Marxism from the communist movements after 1919)". BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]