Talk:Oscar Burkard

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oscar Burkard article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation Stub‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article was accepted on 6 April 2008 by reviewer 72.74.205.52 (talk · contribs).

Military history: Biography / North America / United States / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War I task force

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.

Private?[edit]

How can he be a private with all those stripes and chevrons? 84.23.155.84 (talk) 09:58, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy in editing.[edit]

I agree with the last person who posted; the caption accompanying the phot states is depicts Burkard "shortly after" having been awarded the Medal of Honor. If that is correct, then why is he wearing the rank insignia of what appears to be a First Sergeant as opposed to that of a Private?

In the 1800s and throughout the 1900s, it was not uncommon for a soldier to be promoted very rapidly and very high up the rank structure, especially after having performed and/or being decorated for an act of bravery. There are at least these few plausible explanations for the disparity:

1. Burkard may have been promoted as such, which requires the article to be edited stating as much,

2. Burkard was promoted PRIOR TO the act for which he was awarded the Medal of Honor, which requires the article to be edited stating as much,

3. The caption is incorrect, and the photo was NOT taken "shortly after" the act, which requires that the photo's caption to be edited,

Either way, someone (perhaps the original person who posted the article) should research, investigate, look into, etc, and clear up the discrepancies.

Thank you

Magnet For Knowledge (talk) 05:40, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]