Talk:Oskar Schindler/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 04:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments[edit]

I've read this through, verified the references, and checked the image copyright status. I find the article is comprehensive, very well written and thoroughly referenced, and meets all GA standards. Excellent work! - Lemurbaby (talk) 04:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good gravy. This is my first one to pass without needing any tweeks. Thanks for taking the time to do the review. Best, -- Diannaa (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]