Talk:Osteitis fibrosa cystica

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleOsteitis fibrosa cystica has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 21, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
February 19, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
March 13, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
May 27, 2009Good article nomineeListed
June 6, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 11, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Good article


Automate archiving?[edit]

Does anyone object to me setting up automatic archiving for this page using MiszaBot? Unless otherwise agreed, I would set it to archive threads that have been inactive for 30 days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oneiros (talkcontribs) 18:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An archive was created by ClueBot III in October 2009 (history). The old discussions had not been removed from this page, so I did that in my previous edit (diff). — Athaenara 04:35, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. Anyway, I've set up automatic archiving and archive indexing, although the archiving will kick in only after more then ten threads.--Oneiros (talk) 04:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To-do[edit]

Because I'll probably end up coming back to this as a way to procrastinate for things in the real world:

  • Add pathophysiology diagram
  • Gross tumor images
  • Expand sections or merge them
  • Parathyroid adenoma
  • Parathyroid carcinoma
  • Renal complications
  • Pathophysiology
  • Epidemiology
  • Medical Management
  • Surgical Management
  • Prognosis
  • Blood testing details (normal levels, interpretations, reliability)
  • More on Cysts
  • Check licensing on images
  • Copyedit for medical jargon

Strombollii (talk) 23:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So you're planning to do more work here huh?--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 00:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it needs it. HahaStrombollii (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's pretty well off...if you need sources, your university library is likely stockpiled with 'em. If you need help, give me a jingle.  :-) NYMFan69-86 (talk) 01:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, getting access to sources isn't a problem. Finding sources about a disease like OFC is the tough part. Strombollii (talk) 03:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I could just well imagine. Especially in the field of medicine, older literature is likely outdated. That leaves only very current books and online sources, the latter of which may be largely speculative. Good luck.NYMFan69-86 (talk) 02:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Under Causes[edit]

Anyone involved in dialysis knows that the water must be fluoride free. I suggest this well reference edit should be reinstated. Comments?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Osteitis_fibrosa_cystica&type=revision&diff=879662952&oldid=863996316

Seabreezes1 (talk) 22:07, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]