Talk:Osteopath

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Osteopath redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Alternative medicine

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Skepticism High‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment[edit]

how did this article regress to this shyte????????????

de Mennato (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2008 (UTC) added a citation –doesn't show up.... cant understand why. will try to get back to it later.[reply]

Slang[edit]

The term osteopath is legally recognised and regulated in the UK. It is not a "slang noun", and it would be both misleading and professionally insulting to suggest such a thing. See [1]. As for the AOA's attitude toward the term, they use it themselves - [2] - in relation to countries outside the USA. From their own glossary: "osteopath: 1. A person who has achieved the nationally recognized academic and professional standards within her or his country to independently practice diagnosis and treatment based upon the principles of osteopathic philosophy. Individual countries establish the national academic and professional standards for osteopaths practicing within their countries (International usage). 2. Considered by the American Osteopathic Association to be an archaic term when applied to graduates of U.S. schools." [3]

It is a worldwide recognised term. It is, however, considered by the AOA to be an archiac term as applied to graduates of US schools. SilkTork *^YES! 13:03, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]