Talk:Overhead (computing)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the Protocol overhead page were merged into Overhead (computing). For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. (29 July 2017) |
Difficult to understand[edit]
I had trouble understanding this article. I can see that this is a work in progress. I honestly think that everything is explained too quickly and in a way that only really advanced people can understand. I don't want to offend anyone, because I'm sure it's a pretty good article as is. I am just wondering if it could be dumbed down a tad in some spots for the people that would be benefited most by this article--those that have no prior experience with computational overhead and similar articles. Thanks a bunch and good luck! 98.202.38.225 (talk) 02:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC) it is written by laisenbi on 5.13 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.77.130.11 (talk) 09:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
"in a way that only really advanced people can understand" - I completely agree. Admitted, I am a biologist, but in my opinion, Wikipedia's biological articles, in which terminology is explained, usually take on more profound and comprehensible, indeed "dumbed down" forms. Aleneen (talk) 19:14, 10 May 2015 (UTC)