Talk:PLUM keyboard

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the PLUM keyboard article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Writing systems Low‑importance

	Writing portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Writing systems, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage and content of articles relating to writing systems on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project’s talk page.Writing systemsWikipedia:WikiProject Writing systemsTemplate:WikiProject Writing systemsWriting system articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image[edit]

This article needs an image or a table that shows how the keys are arranged.

This image could be used (as a reference to the table) or we could just ask for permission to use their image.

Manufacturer's case for "PLUM", wiki convention for "keyboard". Andy Dingley (talk) 10:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to Plum?[edit]

Plum's website has been down for quite some time now, and I think that was the only way to get one of these. Anyone know why they're down, and if these keyboards will be available again? (I really need to get one, and the article is going to have to mention the lack of availability, if they are indeed not making these anymore) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dario D. (talk • contribs) 23:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First sentence makes no sense.[edit]

Something wrong with the grammar. 61.15.85.96 (talk) 20:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]