Talk:Pacific Rim (film)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 00:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1a. A pass throughout.
1b. Lead is crisp, however the "Video game" and "Music" sections need to be expanded, while the "Marketing" section needs to amend its bulleted format, and adopt paragraphs, as does the "Sequel" section.

Done "Video game" section has been expanded as much as it could be. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 16:25, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Assassin!, the music section is still too short (and doesn't have any paragraphs longer than two sentences), and the marketing and sequel sections are still bulleted. You only addressed one of QatarStarsLeague's points. Sock (The Editor Formerly Known as Corvoe) ^{(be heard)} 17:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sock; I'm doing that too, I did the "Video game" section first and I mentioned here, now I'm going to expand "Music" section. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 23:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Captain Assassin!: Ahh, gotcha. You marked it "done", which you don't usually do until you've done all of it. I just wanted to double check. Great work so far! Sock (The Editor Formerly Known as Corvoe) ^{(be heard)} 23:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done Article's sections expanded and adopted paragraphs forms. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 23:07, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2a. This complies with the layout standards.
2b. We need citations for the quote given by Del Toro regarding Day's character in the "Cast" section, the last sentence of the "Principal photography" section, and finally the last sentence of the first paragraph of the "Design" section.

Done All requested sentences are cited now. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 01:45, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2c. No original research; passage granted.
3a. Its breadth touches upon all topics.
3b. It is comprehensive on a scale of great grandeur, however it does not descend down tangents.
4. It is impartial.
5. It appears stable.
6a.
6b.

This article is on the precipice of qualifying for GA status. It is superbly conceived, and, pending some amendments, will pass forthwith. Excellent work! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 03:32, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@QatarStarsLeague: @Sock: Is there anything else needs to be done? --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 17:22, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]