Talk:Pairwise coprime

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result was merge into Coprime integers. -- Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Should this article be merged into Coprime? Richard Pinch (talk) 17:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then articles which mentioned pairwise coprimality would have to link to a section of the coprime article. On the other hand I guess the only reason I followed the link was because I wondered what other types of coprime there were than pairwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.106.217.169 (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I vote yes: this article will never naturally have enough information to merit being its own article, while it would work very naturally as a section or two of the article coprime. I've stuck on a template. Joel B. Lewis (talk) 00:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, and there' consensus at the other talk page, as well. I'm going ahead with the merge. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.