Talk:Paix des Braves

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy? The signing of this Agreement was very controversial and a low percentage of Cree beneficiaries participated in the vote. There is a documentary on this entitled 'One More River.' Perhaps a section should be added to the article discussing the controversial nature of this agreement instead of just praising it for it's application of a suggestion from the Royal Commission on Aboriginal People. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.82.226.22 (talk) 20:29, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's an excellent idea. If you want to start such a section, you'd have my help, I can promise that. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:35, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agreement Respecting a New Relationship Between the Cree Nation and the Government of Quebec. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]