Talk:Papi Chulo's/GA1

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gerald Waldo Luis (talk · contribs) 15:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should be an easy one. Will review this article. I'm not gonna lie, GA nominations give me more faith in humanity. Gerald WL 15:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:27, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Description[edit]

Link California and Mexico? Gerald WL 15:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:12, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I will not assume it's a painting of a Corona and a lime. Gerald WL 15:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've linked to Corona (beer). ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:13, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I know. First time I've heard of that beer name. My surprise towards the name probably is what happens when your life is fully Smirnoff. Gerald WL 16:41, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"as "a popular late-night destination for hungry club and bar patrons" prior to the COVID-19 pandemic." Is Zukin referring to the resto's state before the pandemic? If so, I recommend making it ""...and bar patrons"— that is, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic." Gerald WL 15:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've changed the text, not exactly as suggested but enough to make this more clear. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Menu[edit]

Whoa, whoa, whoa! Not so hot, man. Gerald WL 15:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gerald Waldo Luis, So, this one's tough, because a lot of the entree options use similar ingredients and the sources describe them in various ways. I understand citation overkill, but in this case I think the four citations actually work well together to provide an adequate summary of the menu. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another Believer, mind excuse as I read the citations? Gerald WL 16:24, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gerald Waldo Luis, Sure, feel free to review sources and determine if there's a citation to move so they are not all bundled at the end. I do think they are all helpful, though. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:28, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another Believer, So.... this is a doozy. But quantitatively and qualitatively, I'll say I change my mind: latter's better-- we don't need more citation templates ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°). Gerald WL 16:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"margaritas on tap"-- sounds like "on tap" is a slang. Mind explaining or clarifying? Gerald WL 15:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gerald Waldo Luis, Well, "on tap" redirects to Draught beer, but margaritas are not beer so I don't think the link applies. In this case, "on tap" just means patrons are poured margaritas from a big batch of pre-made drink, as opposed to a single-made speciality cocktail. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:17, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another Believer, perhaps why "on tap" redirects to Draught beer is cause of it being served in a cask. Did a Bing check, and apparently there are margas served in a cask. Maybe we can link on tap to cask ale? Gerald WL 16:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gerald Waldo Luis, I don't think we should link to anything beer-related. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:57, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another Believer, so I did a check, Oxford said that, in terms of drinks, it means "ready to be poured from a tap." I do think there has to be a simpler wording, or clarification. There is a Wiktionary entry, but to call it a beer, I find is misleading. Gerald WL 17:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, thanks. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

History[edit]

"He had started"-- which? Gerald WL 16:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another Believer, forget it, I read the another line and then weirdly jumped to a whole other paragraph. Read this edit summary for more info. Gerald WL 16:20, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"for the Fall season"-- recommend decapitalizing "Fall." Gerald WL 16:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Link plaza? Gerald WL 16:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should link Portland Bureau of Transportation. Gerald WL 16:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:19, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"Someone burglarized the restaurant in October[10][15]"-- supported by two citations. Should it be reformatted to "Someone burglarized the restaurant[10] in October[15]"?
- I think that's more distracting, and prefer the current text. There's nothing wrong with having 2 citations. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Link safe? Gerald WL 16:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Second location[edit]

"in the new Alberta Alley development"-- what is the "Alberta Alley development"? Gerald WL 16:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Gerald Waldo Luis, A new development along Alberta called Alberta Alley. There's no article to link to here, and I've already mentioned the location in northeast Portland, which I think is adequate. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the wording a bit to clarify. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:04, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Link courtyard? Gerald WL 16:05, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:22, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The logo image has been reduced. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 03:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.