Talk:Para-snowboarding classification

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePara-snowboarding classification has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 20, 2014Good article nomineeListed
May 29, 2015Good topic candidatePromoted
December 10, 2016Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Para-snowboarding classification/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 18:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Passing lead, "Eligibility", "Governance", "Future".

At the Paralympic Games

  • Is there indeed a hyphen in "snowboard-cross"?
  • You highlight the fact that results were calculated without adjustments. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to make note of this practice in other para-snowboarding events, or other para-sport events. Keep in mind, even if time adjustments are a norm in para-sport, most readers will be unaware of these norms. (Hopefully there's a good generic reference that can be used. If you can't find anything, then I'd even let mention of comparative practice pass without a reference.)

References

  • Reference 5: was this a press release? a web page? Did it get archived by archive.org or any other service?

-- Zanimum (talk) 18:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    • And with all new content too! I've reviewed the new additions as well, no issues to be added. GA! -- Zanimum (talk) 22:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Para-snowboarding classification. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]