Talk:Pasadena (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

I believe that when one types in 'Pasadena' that they should be given an option where to go... not to default to Pasadena, Ca. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terryrandell (talk • contribs) 03:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 September 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: RM reached rough consensus for the move. Performed as requested (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 04:27, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pasadena → Pasadena (disambiguation) – WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT "Pasadena" most commonly refers to Pasadena, California. Pasadena, CA is ~~the most populous city if its name,~~ and of cultural and scientific significance, being site of the Rose Bowl, NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, and Caltech. There are also several US Navy vessels named after it and a tv show. (edit: I stand corrected, thanks) Prisencolin (talk) 17:05, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. The California city gets an overwhelming percentage of the page views compared to the other Pasadenas [1]. Calidum ¤ 03:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't tell anyone from the more populous Pasadena, Texas. — AjaxSmack 13:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above. Not more significant than the Texas city. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 14:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The Texas city may be somewhat more populous, but not more significant. Don't oppose just because I got one fact wrong.--Prisencolin (talk) 15:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pasadena, California, is easily the primary topic. — Gorthian (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I think given that this CA Pasadena was the original one it would win a "long term significance battle", and it also dominates page views, Google hits etc. It is somewhat significant thtat the TX locality has greater population, but really it's just a dormitory suburb of Houston, and not such a significant one on a global level, so I think it's fair to declare a primary topic here. — Amakuru (talk) 10:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Clear primary topic. By far the best known entity by that name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.