Talk:Pasto Ventura

Pasto Ventura has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 21, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Argentina Low‑importance

	Argentina portal This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Pasto Ventura, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes Low‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pasto Ventura/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 00:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria[edit]

1. Prose ✓ Pass

2. Verifiability ✓ Pass

3. Depth of Coverage ✓ Pass

4. Neutral ✓ Pass

5. Stable ✓ Pass

6. Illustrations Likely

7. Miscellaneous ✓ Pass

Passing. Hog Farm (talk) 14:38, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

1.

Per MOS:OVERLINK, I'm not sure if Argentina needs linked
Unlinked. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Link Los Nacimientos, make sure you get the right one from the dab page Los Nacimientos, they both seem to be in the applicable province
Linked, bit I can't say that I am very sure on this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"deposits of lapilli, lava bombs and scoria" - Link scoria
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
"7 volcanic domes,[6] 2 maars and 3 tuff rings;" - I think MOS:NUMERALS applies here
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Mafic is a duplink
All sections should be summarized in the lead, the climate and vegetation section isn't.
Both done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2.

The reference titles and author's name shouldn't be in allcaps
Should refs 4 and 5 have accessdates since the sources are online?
Ref 35 same as above

Done, added to 4 and 5 but not to 35 as that is a journal article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3.

4.

5.

6.

Is an image of this freely available? I understand that with many subjects there isn't one.
Not as far as I know. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

7.

Good work. Placing this one of hold, only a few things to address. Hog Farm (talk) 22:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]