Talk:Pathé

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Another Public Domain Conflict[edit]

As Gaumont, Pathe also claims to have a massive film archive that they distribute under thier banner. From my research many of these films are public domain. Please refer to thier website [1]. Again, this was gone through with the other article American Mutoscope and Biograph Company, yet never questioned on this article. I invite editors to research this, and happy editing!

Cheers! --Roger the red 09:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

British Pathe[edit]

what is the relationship to British Pathe? and who owns what exactly? as the General trust article states this organisation is owned by them but there is no mention of that group as owners on this page, or of it being a british film studio at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.44.71.85 (talk) 21:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like British Pathe[2] is part of Daily Mail and General Trust, and that it should be distinguished from Pathe UK[3], which seems part of Pathé.--Patrick (talk) 06:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The meaning of "profit"[edit]

The article states "Although the company continued to make a profit (as noted above), it lost more money than it could bring in."

If an entity loses more money that it brings in, that is called a "loss" - not a "profit"! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.172.160.41 (talk) 09:56, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pathé. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]