Talk:Paul G. Goebel

Good Article Nomination

I have reviewed this article. The result was on hold.

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   This should be <blockquote>d. This needs more information. Instead of 'one article noted', say 'one article in the Bismark Tribune noted' and give the reporter's name if available. Y Cbl62 (talk) 06:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Everything needs referencing. Yes, I know 'Ford won the election' but you still need to add a reference to it. On the whole the referencing is OK, but this is good article nomination. Y Cbl62 (talk) 06:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The headings are a little long in some areas.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The second picture (i.e. the one not in the infobox) might need a better caption. Maybe cite the source (e.g. taken in 19xx at y by z). --- The second photo is taken from the Wiki Commons and does not have info on the photographer, but I have revised the caption. Y Cbl62 (talk) 06:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Littleteddy (talk) 10:11, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm not the reviewer for this article, but I just wanted to mention one small problem that stood out to me. The "Other civic and political roles" could use a little work. The first sentence uses several semicolons incorrectly and I think it would be better written as several sentences. I'll leave it for the main editor to decide, as I have not contributed to this article and don't want to mess with formatting. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:09, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

YPassed. If the nominator could please add to the list of GAs... I'm due to be on a flight shortly and I don't have time. Littleteddy (roar!) 11:04, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Paul G. Goebel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071226181108/http://www.letterwinnersmclub.com:80/uferwinners.html to http://www.letterwinnersmclub.com/uferwinners.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:53, 22 January 2016 (UTC)