Talk:Paul Steinhardt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

He was not born in 1955, but in 1952. See American Men & Women of Science, 21th ed., 2003, vol. 6 (Q-S), page 975, (http://books.google.com/books?um=1&lr=&q=%22Steinhardt%2C+Paul%22+1952&btnG=Search+Books), and other sources. Astrohist (talk) 13:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright violation or plagiarism?[edit]

The whole thing is very close paraphrasing his CV.--Stone (talk) 00:13, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added References[edit]

I added references to reliable biographical sources and then removed the headers {{primarysources|date=January 2011}} and {{BLP sources|the article might be based on his homepage which is not a reliable source|date=January 2011}}. In my opinion, nothing in this article is controversial or departs from established biographical facts. (I am a professional in the biographee's field and have no other relationship to him.) If anyone thinks that the article is still undersourced, please discuss here. I agree that the article can still use some styistic improvement. ServiceAT (talk) 23:46, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Steinhardt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]