Talk:Paul Ziff

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This entry plagiarizes heavily from the "Remembering Paul Ziff" essay on the UNC Chapel Hill web site.

As I put it in my review in Metaphilosophy,: is this part of it? Andres (talk) 11:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Overly positive[edit]

This article is good though it includes too many sentences that are overly positive and value-judging. Example "Jonathan Cohen said, back in the early 60s, the last chapter "is one of the best discussions of the word 'good' that has ever been published". It still is, forty years later.". Deleet (talk) 09:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mh. No description of his actual ideas, views or arguments, just talk about the external. Andres (talk) 11:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]