Talk:Paul Ziff
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled[edit]
This entry plagiarizes heavily from the "Remembering Paul Ziff" essay on the UNC Chapel Hill web site.
- As I put it in my review in Metaphilosophy,: is this part of it? Andres (talk) 11:05, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Overly positive[edit]
This article is good though it includes too many sentences that are overly positive and value-judging. Example "Jonathan Cohen said, back in the early 60s, the last chapter "is one of the best discussions of the word 'good' that has ever been published". It still is, forty years later.". Deleet (talk) 09:51, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- B-Class Chicago articles
- Low-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles
- B-Class biography articles
- Automatically assessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class philosopher articles
- Low-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- B-Class philosophy of mind articles
- Low-importance philosophy of mind articles
- Philosophy of mind task force articles