Talk:Peace Pledge Union

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anti-war

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is incomplete...[edit]

...without mentioning how this movement, started in the 1930s when European fascism was on the rise, viewed the ensuing war. Did they rail against the draft in Britain and suggest Britain not defend herself? Or did the organization keep a low profile? A2Kafir 20:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've mentioned their support for appeasement in the 'thirties. The article needs a section on their advocacy of conscientious objection in the Second World War. Marshall46 (talk) 22:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Marshall46 (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is now not enough about the post-war period. The article is heavily biased to the 1930s and 1940s. Pelarmian (talk) 09:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article is incredibly biassed[edit]

And makes it look as if the 1930s are the most important thing ever in the history of the organisation. Neonchameleon (talk) 18:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Were they not? According to the article, 135,000 men signed up when it was launched in 1934 but membership declined considerably in 1940. Judging by a JSTOR search, most historians who have written about the PPU focus on the 30s and WWII, which also reflects the focus of the article. It seems therefore that its greatest influence and importance was in the 1930s (when pacifism revived in the late 50s, it seems that the CND that was the main beneficiary). But if they were as important in the postwar period then I agree more should be included. More information about membership numbers throughout the years would also be helpful.—Britannicus (talk) 17:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Start Class?[edit]

Why is this article still rated Start Class? Roundtheworld (talk) 12:01, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]