Talk:Peace education

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peace education article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Globalization High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bill Robb's additions[edit]

I draw Bill Robb's attention to:

WP:COI#Self-promotion: "Conflict of interest often presents itself in the form of self-promotion, including ... material that appears to promote the private or commercial interests of the editor" -- such as frequent links to his own commercial www.valueseducation.co.uk website.
WP:NOR#Citing oneself: "If an editor has published the results of his or her research in a reliable publication, the editor may cite that source" -- the material in question is unpublished in any "reliable publication".
WP:NOR: a large amount of the new material is not even sourced to self-published.
It is considered disruptive to remove maintenance templates, including {{fact}}-tags without correcting the problem.
WP:SELFPUB: "Self-published work is acceptable to use in some circumstances, with limitations. For example, material may sometimes be cited which is self-published by an established expert on the topic of the article, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications. However, caution should be exercised when using such sources: if the information in question is really worth reporting, someone else is likely to have done so. For example, a reliable self-published source on a given subject is likely to have been cited on that subject as authoritative by a reliable source." (emphasis in original)
- As far as I can tell, from looking Robb up with 'Harzing's Publish or Perish', Robb's work has not "been previously been published by reliable third-party publications".

I would therefore conclude that his additions are unsuitable for this encyclopaedia. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 12:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am responding to the request for a third opinion about this topic. I see that Beetstra has already redone the revert from the history page, but since Robb is the one that requested the third opinion, I wanted to be sure that settled the question for him. AlekseyFy (talk) 01:44, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The United Nations and Peace Education[edit]

Original hidden comment:

Do we REALLY want to list every document from the UN that includes the words "peace" & education in the same sentence?
— Hrafn

Response:

ANSWER: Good point - clearly to do so would result in hundreds of references. However it does seem reasonable to list the dozen or so major UN documents as identified in the scholarly reference at the beginning of this section. I've just added one scholarly reference from the DG of UNESCO, and hopefully more scholarly references will be added in the next few days
— 58.164.128.107

Counter-response: generally I would expect "major UN documents" to have their own articles on wikipedia. I would therefore question whether:

Final Document of the Tenth Special Session of the United Nations General Assembly (SSODI - Special Session on Disarmament I
World Congress on Disarmament Education: Final Document and Report &
UNESCO Declaration of Principles on Tolerance

...count as "major UN documents". Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 06:41, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would further point out that the mention of 'peace education' in most of them is tenuous -- seldom coming to more than mentioning 'peace' (as well as a number of other values) and 'education' in the same sentence. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 06:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

B.Ed peace education second year[edit]

Shanti Shiksha Sathi konati avashyak Kaushalya Aahat 2402:8100:2454:7CF7:1:1:6C15:3361 (talk) 06:08, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is this considered peace education[edit]

Sukavich Rangsitpol laid out his plans for educational reform in Thailand. The goal of education reform is to realize the potential of Thai people to develop themselves for the better quality of life and to develop the nation for peaceful co-existence in the world community. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jcrdaen/1/1/1_KJ00006742072/_pdf THER2023 (talk) 07:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Philosophy sec 3 p[edit]

ajoy 2409:4088:9DC1:EC3C:5109:B0D4:D063:F3D7 (talk) 08:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

शांतता शिक्षणात आंतरराष्ट्रीय सहयोग[edit]

jjjjjjjj 2409:4081:104:AE1E:0:0:2354:50A5 (talk) 07:19, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

शांतता शिक्षणात आंतरराष्ट्रीय सहयोग[edit]

Related peace education 2409:4081:104:AE1E:0:0:2354:50A5 (talk) 07:20, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]