Talk:Pearson language tests

PTE Young Learners was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 May 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pearson language tests. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

PTE General was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 24 May 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pearson language tests. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Pearson Test of English Academic was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 May 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Pearson language tests. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notable, wide use, many sources on the international level. Added highbeam one from the beginning of its use. This is unquestionably notable for GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 00:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this is notable and has enough sources to establish notability. The next deletion attempt, if necessary, should happen at AfD. - tucoxn\^talk 01:04, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've put the three other pages on the individual tests up for deletion after merging in much of the content. This will balance it out for now and since the Business unit is notable, its products 'the tests' should be covered here as usual. While it is a naming nightmare, this page is much better now. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 01:43, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]