Talk:Peco

Trains: Transport modelling Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Rail transport modelling task force.

This article lacks references.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV[edit]

A considerable body considers peco track inferior to some other trackbed such as Kato in . There is no doubt Peco is one of the major suppliers of track but whether it is superior to others is POV.

Commercial link[edit]

I am of the opinion that the 'Southern Digital' link is more commercial than strictly relevant; there are a number of similar UK sites which stock/sell Peco products, but would certainly be classed as 'commercial' links. Murray Langton 23:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PeCo (Concrete)[edit]

This should be moved to another page - possible PeCo if it needs it's own page - or else merged into an article on concrete. I don't know enough about the subject to decide but I know it shouldn't be here. Zabdiel 11:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PECO (Philadelphia Electric Company)[edit]

The very unorganized Power provider of South-Eastern Pa (should there be mention article of this?) http://www.puc.state.pa.us/electric/ Hoovie 23:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That link doesn't really work. Try this: http://www.exeloncorp.com/ourcompanies/peco/pecores/

However, PECO already exists and links to Exelon. I'm wondering if there should be some form of Peco (disambiguation) page that can be used in each place? EdJogg 09:28, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by others to PeCo, and the resultant fallout, effectively forced my hand. Peco (disambiguation) now exists and all affected articles point elsewhere appropriately.

PECO redirects to Peco (disambiguation), and all articles previously using PECO now use PECO Energy (which also redirects to Exelon).

EdJogg 12:58, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140904112151/http://www.seatonbay.com/attractions/peco.html to http://www.seatonbay.com/attractions/peco.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Article name: Peco or PECO[edit]

The company always styles itself as PECO rather than Peco, as used in the title to this article. Should it be changed to the correct capitalised version? 109.159.4.2 (talk) 07:14, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 February 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peco → PECO – The company always styles itself as PECO rather than Peco. Onlk (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. And Lego always styles itself as LEGO, and yet our article title is Lego. This is not an acronym. Walrasiad (talk) 00:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per comments of Walrasiad, MOS:ALLCAPS, MOS:TM, WP:TITLETM. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 02:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose move per above. Not an acronym or initialism. O.N.R. ^(talk) 05:16, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.