Talk:Pedro Nava (politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force.

First Wife?[edit]

Wasn't Pedro Nava married to someone else at one point? We should probably mention that here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.187.160.28 (talk) 18:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

There can't be any doubt about his notability, per WP:NPOL # 1, as a member of a state legislature. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 03:18, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I came across this article while searching articles needing cleaning and I'm not sure if he is notable. The article obviously has issues and a look through the history shows it. My searches found results at News, Highbeam and a few Newspapers Archive. Also a few results at Books (but nothing looks promising) and nothig at Thefreelibrary. It seems he may be notable but I wanted to know before editing the article (if found notable, I'm willing to improve it). SwisterTwister talk 18:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notable. Elected officials are considered notable. Andrew³²⁷ 00:17, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notable - As above, elected officials are notable. It's a mess though so good luck whipping it into shape :). Flat Out (talk) 00:27, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Why is an RFC being used to determine notability? The usual means for checking notability is Articles for Deletion. As an elected state legislator, he passes notability. If this were at AFD, I would recommend blow it up and start over. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:59, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: That's what I initially intended but considering the article is a mess and there was a possibility he was notable, I wanted comments rather than a possible AfD where they'll say speedy keep. SwisterTwister talk 18:17, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I made this a stub, as 99.9% of the material was unsourced, per WP:BLP and WP:V. It is in the history, and it can be brought back with appropriate sourcing. - Cwobeel (talk) 00:25, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is more acceptable, thanks. I was willing to improve it but honestly it seemed like it was going to be too much work (as it is, I'm not a fan or expert of politics). SwisterTwister talk 05:51, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this RfC is a little off the mark, because AfD is the usual place to determine notability; but for what it's worth, as an elected official he is clearly notable. Cwobeel did the right thing in cleaning out unsourced info. Vanamonde93 (talk) 03:08, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.