Talk:Pennsylvania Route 576

Pennsylvania Route 576 was nominated as a Engineering and technology good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (November 29, 2014). There are suggestions below for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

U.S. Roads: Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Locations

Pennsylvania

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	A fact from this article was featured on the Did you know? section of the U.S. Roads Portal in August 2007.

Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I-576 upgrade[edit]

This site page 10 said eventually they may change APTP 576 to i-576.--Freewayguy ^{Msg USC} 22:04, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How about a map?[edit]

One showing the current and proposed routes would be a good idea. Will (Talk - contribs) 00:21, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can request one at WP:USRD/MTF/R. Dough 48 72 00:52, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interstate Standards[edit]

PA Turnpike 43 and PA Turnpike 576 are not being built to Interstate standards just for the I-576 designation. They're being built to Interstate standards because it's the law. All freeways that are built need to be built to Interstate standards, and many non-Interstates and non-future-Interstates are being upgraded.

Multi Trixes! (Talk - Me on Wikia) 20:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Glitch?[edit]

OK, I'm trying to remove the template at the bottom below "External Links", since it isn't needed to have a mileage template there. But every time I do it, it messes up the other templates. How can we remove it without messing everything else up? What's strange is that when you preview it, it looks fine. Jgera5 (talk) 14:36, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An IP graciously added an exit 19. Whether or not that exit will be legit, it was using {{Jctbtm}} instead of {{PAint}} for a junction entry, so I removed it outright. –Fredddie ™ 19:57, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pennsylvania Route 576/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rschen7754 (talk · contribs) 05:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 12 is dead.
Usually citations are not put in the lead if the details are cited in the rest of the article.
The third paragraph seems awfully trivial to put in the lead. Maybe elsewhere, but not in the lead.
doesn't - please do not use contractions in an article.
While it could be argued that Pittsburgh does have somewhat of an existing beltway - sounds like WP:OR
Additionally, I-70 in between Washington and New Stanton, as well as the Turnpike, are not up to modern Interstate Highway standards. - how is that relevant here?
A bunch of uncited stuff at the end of "Early development"
And stuff that is missing. We go from the 1980s to 2003 just like that. In the modern era, I find it hard to believe that there are no sources out there that provide information about how the highway was developed during those years.
The Findlay Connector was called as such - wordy
More uncited stuff
it would be a major boom for both the Southern Beltway - too colloquial, and how can a highway benefit from the opening of a plant?
it will be signed as Interstate 576 - was it ever approved by AASHTO and FHWA?
In the RJL - Access to McDonald and Pennsylvania Route 980 - what is McDonald? Also, we already said PA 980, why do we need to repeat it in this column?
Also in the RJL - if it's not a complete sentence, it does not get a period.

Given that this fails the sourcing and broad criterion of GA, and due to the large amount of work needed to fix the article, I will need to fail it at this time. --Rs chen 7754 20:28, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still not I-576[edit]

I bring this up because at least two RSs have referred to the highway recently as such: The Post-Gazette in the "generational project" article in the refs, #31 as I write this, and KDKA-TV (this also made air). With the philosophy of WP only being as good as its RSs (WP:NOTRIGHT), this might cause a conflict, especially with the emphasis on secondary sources. I don't know if there's a source somewhere explicitly stating that it's not I-576 just to clarify. Mapsax (talk) 23:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]