This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Thailand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Thailand-related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systematic bias group aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Thailand-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.ThailandWikipedia:WikiProject ThailandTemplate:WikiProject ThailandThailand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Discussion on how best to handle the article can continue below. Cúchullaint/c 03:43, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Article only contains soft redirect to wiktionary, disambiguation here is not needed. BOVINEBOY2008 00:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment that's a new unreviewed article, for an unreleased film, does it meet notability? From the current contents, it's a candidate for speedy deletion, having no mention of notability. It also has an April 2015 release date, so probably is a WP:TOOSOON. -- 76.65.128.112 (talk) 06:05, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The notability and citations issues should be resolved first before any such page move. Otherwise it is a pointless exercise if this article is eventually only going to get deleted. Zzyzx11 (talk) 16:42, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - whether or not it is deleted is irrelevant at a WP:RM discussion, and I have no opinion on that. However, up to now I don't see that anyone has indeed nominated it for deletion. As the only use of the term on Wikipedia, this is a straightforward move. — Amakuru (talk) 21:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
We can decide to incubate it instead. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 08:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - and the "disambiguation page" should be speedily deleted. Red Slash 04:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "Pernicious" would be the adjective form for perniciousness ; WP:ADJECTIVE would suggest that if the noun-form is more likely then the adjective form should redirect to the noun-form, and a hatnote added there for other uses of the adjective form. -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
