Talk:Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Modern Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Modern philosophy

General issues[edit]

This article has many claims and few citations. A lengthy portion of it (on the influence of the work) reads like a short college essay, only lacking, as mentioned before, many citations. Even in the discussion of the work itself, it relies on secondary sources rather than the material it reports on. Needs work. 2601:645:0:F480:F095:3F1A:BE48:34EE (talk) 02:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]