Talk:Perry the Platypus/GA1

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   I fixed a few spelling errors RJFJR (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   It has extensive references

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   Seems sufficiently complete without excessive digression

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Looks OK on NPOV to me.

5. It is stable.

   Reasonable stable (most recent changes were by me fixing spelling RJFJR (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC))

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   4 images: 3 drawings have fair use reasons attached, last is a photo (at commons) with an 'own work' status.

7. Overall:

   Pass RJFJR (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

   Thanks for the review! The Flash ^{talk} 18:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)