Talk:Peter Badcoe/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AustralianRupert (talk · contribs) 11:10, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I will review this article for GAN. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:10, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments: AustralianRupert (talk) 00:39, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • VC/Victoria Cross is linked twice in the lead, but I can see the usefulness of doing this (no action required)
  • in the lead, I suggest maybe starting a new paragraph at "In 2008, his medal set..."
  • do we know what posting or role he had between 1950 and 1952?
  • From memory there is some mention of service in one of the National Service Battalions before Portsea, in They Dared Mightily. I don't have access to it to check at the moment, though. Possibly it was the 16th per this: [1]. Probably worth a mention. Is the service record available through the NAA? If so, it would probably clear things up further. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • G'day, I managed to get a look at They Dared Mightily at the work library, so I have added this for you now. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:33, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Despite his father's opposition: do we know what is objection was?
  • changed his surname to Badcoe: do we know why?
  • No worries, the obvious reason is probably the most likely, I suppose. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:11, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • served a tour with them in the Federation of Malaya: perhaps explain why they deployed to Malaya at that time?
  • in the body it says his observation tour in Vietnam was November 1962, but the lead implies it was 1961
  • led an frontal assault --> "led a frontal assault"
  • Captain Clement and Sergeant Thomas: do we know their first names?
  • Dodging through automatic fire --> "Dodging automatic fire"
  • Badcoe was travelling in a vehicle with his deputy and another US officer, when it veered off the road into a ditch and Badcoe's deputy was killed. Badcoe left the vehicle.. --> "Badcoe was travelling in a vehicle with his deputy and another US officer, when it veered off the road into a ditch. Badcoe's deputy was killed and he left the vehicle..."
  • garrison of the district headquarters were saved --> "was saved"?
  • He was a "veritable tiger" in combat: suggest attributing this in text
  • headquarters duty officer that due: the word "that" seems out of place here
  • straight for an enemy machine position: missing word "machine gun"
  • in the Vietnam War section, Viet Cong is overlinked
  • "File:Peter Badcoe c.1950's P00942.002.JPG": suggest adjusting the date on the description page from "1950s" to "c. 1954" per the source: [2]. Additionally, it could probably take the PD-AustraliaGov licence
  • ext links work (no action required)
  • there are no dabs (no action required)
  • sources all appear to be reliable and all information appears to be referenced (no action required)
  • capitalisation: "Victoria Cross: Australia's Finest and the Battles they Fought" --> "Victoria Cross: Australia's Finest and the Battles They Fought"?
  • in the Websites and gazettes section, "Sydney Morning Herald" --> italics?
  • in the Vietnam War section or the later part of the Early life section, an extra image in the first part of the section would help break up the text a little better (suggestion only). For instance, this image might work: [3] or this one [4]
  • The operation concluded successfully.[11][5][12]: suggest ordering the refs numerically
  • of the district headquarters.[13][5][14]: same as above

Criteria

1. Well written: checkY

a. the prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. Verifiable with no original research: checkY

a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
b. all in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be

challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;

c. it contains no original research; and
d. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism.

3. Broad in its coverage: checkY

a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. checkY

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute checkY

6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: checkY

a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Peter_Badcoe/GA1&oldid=899171200"