Talk:Peter Knecht

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I don't believe the subject of this article is notable enough to merit a Wikipedia page. In addition, the content of the article seriously violates NPOV; in fact, I would not be surprised if Peter Knecht wrote this article himself. I suggest swift deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.28.219.44 (talk) 17:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect you're right about the latter, but searching for reliable, secondary sources, I see enough material to establish notability under the WP:GNG. I've taken a knife through a lot of the promotional material, some of which is copied from Knecht's own material as well. But yeah, still needs work.--j⚛e decker ^talk 18:07, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]