Talk:Phyllanthus urinaria

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Potential references[edit]

From [1]. See discussion: --Ronz (talk) 18:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you for your opinion and suggestion.

This review is meant for readers who would like to delve deeper into the subject. The review is placed in the “further reading” – section because the Wikipedia guideline for this section read: “… publications that would help interested readers learn more about the article subject. The Further reading section (…) should normally not duplicate the content of the References section” (WP:FURTHER).

The Wikipedia content guideline for “Identifying reliable sources (medicine)” (WP:MEDRS) read: “It is usually best to use reviews and meta-analyses where possible.”

The review in question reflect the latest research (last 10 years) in the field, it is scholarly and peer-reviewed, and it is published in an academic journal. Granateple (talk) 23:09, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]