Talk:Physical information security

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Merge into Social engineering (security)?[edit]

It is possible this content would be more appropriate if included within the social engineering page. I wasn't sure what to do with it, so I created a separate article. --Starschreck 04:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I vote NAY to the merge proposal. Because Physical Information Security is about the safeguarding of the actual medium that the information is stored on (paper or data), but Social engineering (security) is about the coercion of information from humans. I am surprised that this article does not mention more about security of live information in the physical sense. i.e. server rooms, server cabinets, safes, distribution of physical keys, breach protocols, etc. --Emana 09:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No discussion of hacker dongles, USB fobs, etc? =[edit]

I would think these devices (dongles, USB fobs, etc.) would be an important topic to discuss within the aspect of physical security. If a rack of servers is in a less-than-secure location, anyone can fairly easily install something, very quickly, that could compromise the entire system. Rlaird (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]