This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Pokémon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Pokémon universe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PokémonWikipedia:WikiProject PokémonTemplate:WikiProject PokémonPokémon articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
The name of the work ise "Pokemonument", from the inscription on it and all coverage. I think the actual name of the work is a better title for the article than the Wikipedia neologism "Pikachu (sculpture)". Any justification for having the article at this neologism rather than the artwork's title? -- Infrogmation (talk) 08:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I went with "Pikachu (sculpture)" because naming seemed inconsistent. Even the article titles below mention the following: Pokemonument, Pokemon statue, Pikachu Pokemonument, Pikachu monument, Pokemon statue, Pikachu statue, etc. ---Another Believer(Talk) 16:31, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
