Talk:Pikes Hotel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePikes Hotel has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 22, 2013Good article nomineeListed

(Comment)[edit]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pikes Hotel, Ibiza/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pks1142 (talk · contribs) 04:24, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Yachtsman and former hat maker Pike led a very colourful life, which had already seen him shipwrecked in the Caribbean, injured in a bobsleigh accident, serving in the military, indulge in heavy drinking, and married and divorced three times.
What this means? How this is related to the history?

A brief background of his colourful life I think is important for understanding the colorful history of the hotel. The hotel history is closely related to his personality and the hedonism at the hotel. ♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:50, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • According to me, the Description of video is not necessary.
I've trimmed it a bit, but I think the context is relevant.
  • Pike who described Mercury as "the most beautiful person I've ever met in my life. So entertaining and generous." Is it a Biographical page of Mercury?
Trimmed that out and the stuff about him seeking comfort, but the party details are relevant to the hotel and are interesting.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld 21:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • At many places, it sounds like a biographical page of Pike (person) in the history section.
  • Overall: The article meets the GA criteriaPrashant talk 21:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

The article meets the criteria. Hence, passing it.Prashant talk 02:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]