Talk:Pipedream (toolkit)

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Attribution note[edit]

A substantial part of this article is based on text from the CISA alert report at https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa22-103a , which is in the public domain as a work on the U.S. federal government. — The Anome (talk) 07:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible source[edit]

I'm busy at the moment so I can't contribute as much as I'd like, but while reading the news I came across this Ars Technica article about Pipedream. Hopefully someone can find it useful! [1] xRENEGADEx ^{(talk | contribs)} 01:28, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ars Technica and Wired (magazine) are somehow related (maybe shared ownership under Conde Nast?), and as such, sometimes content from one gets published in the other. In the case of the linked article, it originally appeared in Wired, and it is already used as a source in the article. Somers-all-the-time (talk) 03:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Omron NEX[edit]

There is no NEX, likely means NX series PLC. (I realize the text of the original article does mistakenly say NEX).Feldercarb (talk) 16:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]