Talk:Planner (programming language)

Robotics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article was nominated for deletion: see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/PLANNER. Consensus was to keep the article. — Gwalla | Talk 05:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Title[edit]

The article should be moved into Planner programming language to keep consistency with other articles on Wiki. Pavel Vozenilek 06:25, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I've actually moved it, both for your reason, and because there were at least 2 links pointing to Planner which were talking about the project-management software. Give me a few hours to check which one all of the 'what links here' pages refer to...! Ojw

It is stated, that Kowalski was about to implement a (logic-based) subset of Micro-Planner "called Prolo" "in collaboration with Comerauer"

when reading "the brith of Prolog" this seems to be simply not true. As Colmerauer states "this work had little influence" in the paper mentioned. Even, the first implementation of Prolog was done by P. Roussel.141.89.226.149 15:20, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Genesis of Prolog duplicated[edit]

The Genesis of Prolog duplicates what's included in History of logic programming#The Genesis of Prolog and should be removed ... 219.78.109.41 16:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]