Talk:Plasma confinement
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | On 31 July 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Plasma containment to Plasma confinement. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Temperature[edit]
"a plasma by definition has a temperature orders of magnitude higher than the degradation temperature of any known material." I'm pretty sure that's false. The flame article says some flames are hot enough to be plasma. The hottest flame mentioned is 4,525 °C. That's hotter than the "known material" Rene 41 (649/982°C), but not "orders of magnitude higher". See also nonthermal plasma. I'm toning that phrase down. 2601:8:B500:862:DDBE:B5D5:2AD5:B5CC (talk) 16:07, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Requested move 31 July 2021[edit]
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 16:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
Plasma containment → Plasma confinement – I believe this is the more common terminology. Frap (talk) 13:47, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.