This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles
I've read the article now and cannot see where the NPOV charge is coming from. The article is not written promotionally, and everything is pretty well sourced. The discussion on this page only seems to pertain to a section I've just removed that did not have proper referencing. Without that section, I do not see how there is an NPOV claim, so I'm going to remove the tag. Please let me know if you disagree? After a year and a half if there is no actual discussion of a NPOV issue, then in my opinion the tag has become obsolete. Jeremy112233 (talk) 17:20, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just adding an update--someone at some point added a lot of promotional activity here. Not suggesting NPOV is at play (no pun intended) but I've added non-primary tag. I don't have Highbeam access, but believe this article may be using far more press releases than I've been able to catch.Jeremy112233 (talk) 21:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Howdy! I've basically rewritten the article, tried to remove as many press releases as I could, and feel that it meets NPOV in its current state, so I'm gonna remove the maintenance tag. If anyone disagrees, anyone can add it back. The company seems a lot less active now, so hopefully the risk that this problem'll rear its head again is fairly low. ~Judy(job requests) 17:48, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
