Talk:Plunderathon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Plunderathon article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Notability[edit]

I can add more info to this, and dig up the old newspaper articles, but I am not sure how that will help the "notability" requirement. This spectacle is basically the same thing as Santacon (which has a wikipedia entry) and is even run by the same people, and is larger than most cities' Santacons, so IMHO if Santacon gets an entry, Plunderathon should too.

I think this is more an issue of my lack of skill at creating a wiki than an issue with the subject itself.

Thoughts? Let's at least try to fix this before resorting to deletion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.34.89.191 (talk • contribs) 16:25, May 1, 2007

Hi, I'm not entirely sure this is notable either, but it sounds like fun and I did some cleanup on the article. As far as your arguments about notability, you should be aware that saying other stuff exists doesn't really work. It's up to you to prove notability by citing your sources. Be sure to study WP:NOTE. The {{notability}} tag doesn't automatically lead to deletion, it's more like a friendly reminder to improve the article. I don't know how the editor who tagged the article feels about it, you might ask him/her. Happy editing and you might think about signing up for an account. Katr67 19:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I forgot to log in (new guy error #1,293 it seems), so the edits I made were unsigned. I agree that "other stuff exists" is a poor argument; chalk it up to pre-coffee ramblings I guess. I am admittedly biased because I attend this event myself every year, but I believe this is at least locally notable (though dozens of people fly in to the city from out of state to attend) due to its size, visibility, impact on the community and general uniqueness. The wiki guidelines seem mainly to deal with "was this covered by outside sources," which it has been (the state's main newspaper, some local papers, bunch of fairly uncitable blogs, two radio stations, etc, none of which was advertising in nature or the result of a press release). The wiki guidelines also state that notability is synonymous with "attracting notice," and trust me, 200 drunken pirates with real weaponry blocking off the streets in the downtown financial district of the state's largest city during a summer afternoon attracts notice. And police presence.

The notability tag was added before most of the text that is there now was created, so perhaps the person who tagged it will reconsider at some point.--Davethehorrible 19:44, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"trust me, 200 drunken pirates with real weaponry blocking off the streets in the downtown financial district of the state's largest city during a summer afternoon attracts notice. And police presence." LOL Katr67 20:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]