Talk:Point of difference

Brands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Industrial design Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Major edit[edit]

I began by adding links so that it would not be a dead-end page, and ended up by also making a major edit. I attempted to retain the basic information while making it more concise. There is still a need to add content and citations. That is why I've labeled it as a stub.--LtlKty^{talk | contribs} 05:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is another page that deals with both POP and POD: Points-of-parity/points-of-difference. I suggest keeping these pages separate and moving the other page to Point of parity. Comments? Help? -Drdisque 19:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Points-of-parity/points-of-difference[edit]

Same concept -- Callinus (talk) 19:54, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]