Talk:Polaris Sales Agreement/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil (talk · contribs) 01:16, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

• The title of the Goldberg source should be "The Atomic Origins of the British Nuclear Deterrent". There's another Goldberg article titled "The Military Origins of the British Nuclear Deterrent".

  OOPs. I have copies of both papers here. Corrected. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

• "hunter-killer submarine programme" – please link at first instance. Also, why isn't "attack submarine" used instead?

  All the sources use "hunter killer". This is what the US and Royal Navies called them at the time, but later they switched to "attack submarine" to emphasise other roles. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

--Sp33dyphil (talk) 07:02, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: