Talk:Political hip hop
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Political hip hop article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years  |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 July 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
does the artist have to be very popular?[edit]
Akir is pretty propular for his deep involvement and his music also as a political rapper so shouldnt he go here?
- If there's going to be a list of artists it should be on a separate page like has been done for the anarchist hip hop sub genre. I agree with the sentiment that letting this article degenerate into a list will destroy it. Give the 2 or three best known in each sub genre and let that be it. I've gone ahead and created a separate page so ya'll can list to your hearts content without bloating this article. it's linked at the bottom of the first section. Anarchocelt (talk)
Phsycho realm & The Visionaries[edit]
arent these two political hip hop groups that should be included on this list they should be instead of rappers like chamillionaire
Sources for consideration[edit]
| A bunch of newspaper articles... |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
| ...some books... |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
| ...and a scholarly work. |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
May be useful for improving the article... it sure isn't looking too good right now... east.718 at 06:11, July 2, 2008
Redirect[edit]
Should Radical hip-hop" redirect here? All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 15:55, 3 May 2014 (UTC).
Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Digital Humanities[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2022 and 16 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bdenson7718 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Bdenson7718 (talk) 22:33, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- Bibliography-
- Conscious rap music: Movement music revisited a qualitative study ... - GSU. (n.d.). Retrieved December 12, 2022, from https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=aas_theses
- Oware, M., MatthewOwareEnvelope, AbstractAlternative (or “underground”) rap music proves a worthy site for applying ideas associated with Bourdieu's field of cultural production. I examine how underground rap music blurs the boundaries of restricted and large-scale production, Sapiro, G., O’Brien, J., Lee, S., Hitters, E., Harkness, G., Gosa, T., Elafros, A., Dowd, T., Craig, A., Cheyne, A., Adams, T., Adorno, T., Alexander, M., Anderson, E., Basu, D., Blacking, J., … Hill, M. (2013, December 29). (un)conscious (popular) underground: Restricted cultural production and underground rap music. Poetics. Retrieved December 11, 2022, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X13000806
- Perry, I. (2006). Prophets of the hood: Politics and poetics in hip hop. Duke University Press. Bdenson7718 (talk) 23:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- I made changes to the introduction expanding on the relation between hip hop and politics. Bdenson7718 (talk) 23:01, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
I changed this article title to "Conscious Rap and Political Hip Hop" but it was reverted ?[edit]
"Conscious Rap" is an established term used in Hip Hop Culture. It is a derivative of the Black Consciousness Movement "Political Rap" is like "Political Rock" these describe music but are not actual terms from the music culture itself. For some reason kept reverting my new title "Conscious Rap and Political Hip Hop" back to just 'Political hip hop'. Thus, what happens when you look up "Conscious Rap" in google is 'Political Rap' does come up but many other articles with "Conscious Rap" in the actual article title do come up. So what can happen is people are more often looking for the more popular term "Conscious Rap" and they just skip the Wikipedia and go to these other articles.
Three random books with "Conscious Rap" in the title, just to show it's a recognized term (and a large nomber of articles if you search google):
*Nation Conscious Rap by Joseph D. Eure and James G. Spady | Jan 1, 1991
*Street Conscious Rap by James G. Spady , H. Samy Alim, et al. | Sep 28, 1999
*KENDRICK LAMAR THE KING OF CONSCIOUS RAP: A story of a Compton kid who became a global superstar and the Most Influential Rapper of His Generation (Journey ... US Country and folk musicians series.)| by Paul C. Andrew | Oct 10, 2023 Central16 (talk) 09:28, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- You added a bunch of musical analysis without citing a source,[1] which is why I warned you against violating the policy of WP:No original research. After that, you added a bunch of song titles without citing a source.[2] And you moved the article to a new title: Conscious Rap and Political Hip Hop. The new title should have been in title case such that only the first word is capitalized. And the contentious page move was performed without discussion, which is why I reverted it.
- The book you list above by Paul C. Andrew is self-published and cannot be considered reliable. It's part of a series of books glorifying Trump and American country music, so I would expect it to ignore certain facts and make invalid claims.
- Regarding the page move, it is certainly true that this article explains the two topics of political rap and conscious rap. Some sources say they are the same topic, and other sources say they are slightly different, with concsious rap being uplifting, and political rap being angry. If we are to keep the topics together, we need more sources describing how they are the same. If we are to split up the topics, we need more sources saying they are different. Binksternet (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's a weak diversionary argument and shows bias to ignore 2 books with "Conscious Rap" in the title and dismiss one by mentioning glorification of Trump and country music, which is totally irrelevant. There are over 181,000 results for the term "Conscious Rap" in google and numerous articles over decades using the term in titles and instead of including the title and correcting the title case you revert, being used as an excuse to exclude "Conscious Rap" and it being derivative of the Black Consciousness movement . The existing article opens " Political hip hop is a subgenre of hip hop music that was developed in the 1980s as a way of turning hip hop into a form of political activism. " That is "original research" It implies there is a Hip Hop authority or think-tank does research and development and decided to "turn" Rap into something. In reality it is rap songs that are political, social critiques sometimes with spiritual/religious elements from Afrocentricity or Black Islamic theology. It was movement of artists of that style not an attempt to turn the whole of Hip Hop music into something. The article starts "Political hip hop is a subgenre of hip hop music " That is "original research" . Rap that is political exists but "political rap" has never been acknowledged by rap artists as an actual genre. "Conscious Rap" has been. "Political rap" is a fair observation but to had instead "Hip Hop", this word "Hip Hop" references a culture, it's attaching a non-culture word to a culture word. "Hip Hop" was a word used by Afrika Bambaataa to include 4 elements: 1) MCing/rapping, 2) DJing/scratching with turntables, 3) breakdancing, and 4) graffiti art. But all these are not prominent in Conscious and Political Rap. Conscious and Political Rap is about lyrical content. There is no requirement for breakdancing or graffiti or even DJing. Hip Hop music is called rap. But despite this the best title for this article is "Conscious rap and political hip hop" . That covers it all. Central16 (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- The Trump book series is self-published by Paul C. Andrew, which is why I dismissed it. God help me if I was to crack it open and read it.
- This article already cites Henry Adaso saying "Conscious hip-hop is often confused with its musical cousin, political hip-hop, possibly because they both speak to social turmoil." Adaso is one of the authors saying that conscious rap is different from political rap, with conscious rap having a more uplifting tone. On the other hand is academic author Karl Kovacs who wrote the textbook From Grassroots to Comercialization: Hip Hop and Rap Music in the USA. Kovacs describes the two types of rap as being mostly the same. Kovacs even combines the two in his prose, writing "political/conscious rap". This is much the same viewpoint as Jeffrey O. G. Ogbar who wrote the book Hip-Hop Revolution: The Culture and Politics of Rap. Ogbar does not think conscious rap is necessarily uplifting, or otherwise different than political rap. He treats them the same. So that's the inertia you would have to overcome to get this topic moving in your desired direction. Some solid sourcing that supports you, and some solid sourcing that opposes you. The topic holds its own contradictions. Binksternet (talk) 01:26, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- "Conscious rap" is already a section in the article. Thus it's a no brainer as to the article being called "Conscious rap and Political Hip Hop" as opposed to only "Political Hip Hop". This reflects the article as it has already been structured thus irrelevant to get into semantics on if the terms are synonymous. They are not exactly synonymous but they have a large overlap. Regardless there could be two separate articles but there is only one. It's one article and that's fine but then it only makes sense to include both in the title of this article because both are already covered and are similar, "Conscious Rap" being the more popular term. Central16 (talk) 06:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- It's a weak diversionary argument and shows bias to ignore 2 books with "Conscious Rap" in the title and dismiss one by mentioning glorification of Trump and country music, which is totally irrelevant. There are over 181,000 results for the term "Conscious Rap" in google and numerous articles over decades using the term in titles and instead of including the title and correcting the title case you revert, being used as an excuse to exclude "Conscious Rap" and it being derivative of the Black Consciousness movement . The existing article opens " Political hip hop is a subgenre of hip hop music that was developed in the 1980s as a way of turning hip hop into a form of political activism. " That is "original research" It implies there is a Hip Hop authority or think-tank does research and development and decided to "turn" Rap into something. In reality it is rap songs that are political, social critiques sometimes with spiritual/religious elements from Afrocentricity or Black Islamic theology. It was movement of artists of that style not an attempt to turn the whole of Hip Hop music into something. The article starts "Political hip hop is a subgenre of hip hop music " That is "original research" . Rap that is political exists but "political rap" has never been acknowledged by rap artists as an actual genre. "Conscious Rap" has been. "Political rap" is a fair observation but to had instead "Hip Hop", this word "Hip Hop" references a culture, it's attaching a non-culture word to a culture word. "Hip Hop" was a word used by Afrika Bambaataa to include 4 elements: 1) MCing/rapping, 2) DJing/scratching with turntables, 3) breakdancing, and 4) graffiti art. But all these are not prominent in Conscious and Political Rap. Conscious and Political Rap is about lyrical content. There is no requirement for breakdancing or graffiti or even DJing. Hip Hop music is called rap. But despite this the best title for this article is "Conscious rap and political hip hop" . That covers it all. Central16 (talk) 22:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Example lists[edit]
It is better not to make lengthy lists of examples, especially in the lead section which is supposed to be a concise summary of the rest of the article. One or two make the point without bloating the lead. MrOllie (talk) 23:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, and each example must be supported by a WP:SECONDARY source naming it as significant to the genre. Even if the entry is moved from the lead section to the article body.
- Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music#Lists says "Music genre articles should not contain lists of performers." I extrapolate this instruction to mean that lists of examples should be as concise as possible, tightly focused, and well supported by cites. Binksternet (talk) 01:05, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Peculiar reversions occurring excluding KRS-One[edit]
This is a previous late January version which keeps getting reverted to, the opening paragraph to the whole article:
Political hip hop is a subgenre of hip hop music that was developed in the 1980s as a way of turning hip hop into a form of political activism. Political hip hop generally uses the medium of hip hop music to comment on sociopolitical issues and send political messages to inspire action, create social change, or to convince the listener of a particular worldview. It was inspired partially by politically-focused 1970s artists such as The Last Poets and Gil Scott-Heron, as well as the Black Power movement and revolutionary politics of the 1960s and 1970s. Various hip hop artists emerged in the 1980s espousing political messages and providing social and political commentary, with the American group Public Enemy in particular establishing themselves as one of the first predominantly political hip hop groups. The genre has helped to create a new form of social expression for subordinate groups to speak about their exclusions, injustices, and lack of power.
Yet the two major albums putting the Political hip hop on the map in terms of artists doing it as their main style are KRS-One's with his album By All Means Necessary (1988) under his group Boogie Down Productions and It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold us Back by Public Enemy also in 1988. In the Wikipedia entry for KRS-One's By All Means Necessary it says:
"The album (By All Means Necessary ) is widely seen as one of, if not the first, politically conscious efforts in hip-hop. AllMusic critic Steve Huey described the album as a landmark of political hip hop"
KRS-One along with Public Enemy are the primary influences on Political Hip Hop, of which in 1988 and beyond there would be a new trend of artists following in 1989 into the 90s and to an extent ongoing yet KRS-One's name is not even mentioned and Boogie Down Productions only once. I don't understand it. KRS-One was the main artist at the time theorizing about Hip Hop and focusing on social and political commentary for whole albums not only in his music but in public appearances and interviews. His persona was "The Teacher" and he called his music "edutainment". I don't understand why he is getting under-represented on this article. This is Hip Hop 101, it's not even a point of controversy and Chuck D has already acknowledged his influence in interviews. Any book on the history of Hip Hop will says this. KRS One's By All Means Necessary is widely seen as one of, if not the first, politically conscious efforts in hip-hop > Wikipedia And Grandmaster Flash's song the Message of 1982 is duly noted in the Origins and development sections of a conscious rap song before artists were known for their primary style and most songs being conscious or political. KRS and Chuck D paved the waved for this any music critic or Golden era Hip Hop artist will attest to this