Talk:Political sociology

This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Sociology High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Start‑class High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Julex1524.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weber?[edit]

Shouldn't Max Weber get a mention on this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.234.251.230 (talk) 03:49, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - I did look into a proposal to add information regardign Weber's view on Social theory. Julex1524 (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Political Sociology Proposals and Edits[edit]

 Hello, I read the political Sociology page and I was a little confused as to why there was barely anything written on the article page itself. What I think would be very useful to add would be more background information, such as information regarding how political sociology really came about, and not just what it is and what it has to do with. Also I believe it would be helpful to speak on governments and how they really deal with different aspects on politics and sociology and how it all ties back together. Also I believe always adding possible controversies would be great as well, I believe that articles should have a controversy/critics aspect because it gives the readers a chance to see both sides of the spectrum and how some people disagreed and why, and what they tried to do about it specifically. So far that's really all I could think of, hope my ideas were clear and help. Luce Fonrose (talk) 17:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Thank you Luce, I have added proposals for information regarding the government, I have reviewed the article for the origin and it already has reference to Weber and Marx.Julex1524 (talk) 14:38, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to add topic "Structural functionalism as seen here : <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_functionalism> viewing society as a whole.Julex1524 (talk) 17:52, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

to 
This topic was covered by the Chair of the Sociology Department at University Massachusetts Lowell. I propose to add - [Power viewed in Political Sociology in its own right signifies how society depends and distributes different needs. Education, Religion, Employment, Health Care and Housing along with the Class status are all areas that rely on the well- being of the community and state.] <Daniel Egan and Levon A. Chorbajian, Power: A Critical Reader (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005> [Persons in power positions can define what our ideals are (right or wrong) and have the resources to build upon it within individuals or groups. It can take on the form to brainwash beliefs and have the society following in respect to believing in better opportunities.] <Kate Nash, Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics, and Power (Wiley-Blackwell, 2010)>

   [Social stratification groups citizens into categories based on their economic class and means of life. Being labeled can have benefits for the upper class and added problems for the lower class. Marxism <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marxism > points out the problems with not having the same resources and the lack of an organized approach to obtain them.] <Power and Inequality www.boundless.com/sociology/textbooks/boundless-sociology-textbook/deviance-social-control-and-crime-7/the-conflict-perspective-on-deviance-63/power-and-inequality-379-8673/> Julex1524 (talk) 21:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

   Proposal to add a link to Karl Marx's Theoretical Models in Political Sociology that stems on social class theory. <http://crab.rutgers.edu/~goertzel/polsoctheories.htm> [There is a relation between class and economy regarding our political bias and the weight it holds in voting patterns. The influence of power and what the economy has and has not to offer the citizens impacts which party they vote for. Individuals social surroundings and the resources they have to voice their needs affect political mind set.]<Siewart Lindenberg, "An Assessment of the New Political Economy: It’s Potential for the Social Sciences and for Sociology in particular." Researchgate.net publication Http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/202177.pdf. 1985>

   Proposal to add definition of "Normal".<https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=normal> [Social Movement can take place in a small scale within communities or in a larger aspect as in issues with women’s equality, transgender, and gay rights. Each area can direct individual opinions by their culture, religion and social interactions. The politics look at the social order and how “normal” is stated and interpreted. ] [“Normal” is defined differently in various social orders. The old views verse the new views and the rights of citizens to organize and stand behind each organization. ] <Contemporary Political Sociology: Globalization, Politics, and Power, Second Ed, Kate Nash, Wiley/Blackwell ltd, Publishing, 2010 Chapter 3:Social Movements >

Proposal: to add definition and link to social trends,<http://www.trendsactive.com/#!/our-trends/societal-trends/ dynamics>

Proposal: to add link regarding Max Weber's political view of social theory. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Weber> Julex1524 (talk) 14:13, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References: 1. Daniel Egan and Levon A. Chorbjian, Power: A Critical Reader(Pearson Prentice Ha..,2005) retrieved June20,2016. 2. Kate Nash, Contemporary Political Sociology: Sociology; Globalization, Politics, and Power ( Wiley-Blackwell,2010) retrieved June 20, 2016. 3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/marxism retrieved June 21,2016. 4.Power and Inequality www.boundless.com/sociology/textbooks/boundless-sociology-textbook/deviance-social-control-and-crime-7/the-conflict-perspective-on-deviance-63/power-and-inequality-379-8673, retrieved June 21,2016. 5. Siewart Lindenberg, "An Assessment of the New Political Economy: It’s Potential for the Social Sciences and for Sociology in particular." Researchgate.net publication Http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/202177.pdf. 1985> 6. "Theoretical Models in Political Sociology," from Political Society, by Ted Goertzel,pub 1976 Rand McNally — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julex1524 (talk • contribs) 13:40, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still working on how to have a photo approved to add to proposal, though I am following the wiki print out it is not an easy task, anyone have a suggestion? Julex1524 (talk) 19:13, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Political sociology[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Political sociology's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Hooghe2001":

From Max Weber: Liesbet Hooghe (2001). The European Commission and the integration of Europe: images of governance. Cambridge University Press. p. 40. ISBN 978-0-521-00143-4. Retrieved 23 March 2011.
From Bureaucracy: Liesbet Hooghe (2001). The European Commission and the integration of Europe: images of governance. Cambridge University Press. pp. 40–. ISBN 978-0-521-00143-4. Retrieved 24 March 2011.

Reference named "AllanAllan2005-172-176":

From Max Weber: Allan, Kenneth D. (2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. pp. 172–76. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.
From Bureaucracy: Kenneth Allan; Kenneth D. Allan (2 November 2005). Explorations in Classical Sociological Theory: Seeing the Social World. Pine Forge Press. pp. 172–76. ISBN 978-1-4129-0572-5.

Reference named "Ritzer2009-38-42":

From Max Weber: George Ritzer (2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. McGraw-Hill. pp. 38–42. ISBN 978-0-07-340438-7. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
From Bureaucracy: George Ritzer (29 September 2009). Contemporary Sociological Theory and Its Classical Roots: The Basics. McGraw-Hill. pp. 38–42. ISBN 978-0-07-340438-7. Retrieved 22 March 2011.

Reference named "BuSach":

From Bureaucracy: Marshall Sashkin; Molly G. Sashkin (28 January 2003). Leadership that matters: the critical factors for making a difference in people's lives and organizations' success. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-57675-193-0. Retrieved 22 March 2011.
From Max Weber: Marshall Sashkin; Molly G. Sashkin (2003). Leadership that matters: the critical factors for making a difference in people's lives and organisations' success. Berrett-Koehler Publishers. p. 52. ISBN 978-1-57675-193-0. Retrieved 22 March 2011.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:08, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: History of Socialism[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2022 and 23 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): SlyRedeemerJT (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by SlyRedeemerJT (talk) 16:15, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Socio-political 103.216.193.98 (talk) 05:58, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]