Talk:Popular Unity Candidacy

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Catalan-speaking countries High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catalan-speaking countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history, languages, and cultures of Catalan-speaking countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Catalan-speaking countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesTemplate:WikiProject Catalan-speaking countriesCatalan-speaking countries articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catalonia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Catalonia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Catalonia and Catalonia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CataloniaWikipedia:WikiProject CataloniaTemplate:WikiProject CataloniaCatalonia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Representation?[edit]

That I know, they haven't reached representation so far. Please feel to amend if necessary. Mountolive 02:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amended. Removed comparison. Would you include in Izquierda Unida that they are more left and, most sectors I would dare say, less Spanish nationalists than PSOE? Toniher 10:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the representation thing: I did a quick search in their webpage but, for sure, I could have done a better one, since I wasn't sure myself I posted the above comment.

However some of them actually from town independent coalition is an obscure statement and should be clarified. I guess it means that they are a part of local lists, in which case the info is quite misleading. Can you confirm this extent?

I understand your reasons for removing the comparison. The thing is that -or so I am guessing- the IU entry states clearly in the definition what kind of political principles they have and no comparasion is necessary, however, this entry does not define those principles, (because just saying "left-wing" is quite vague in this context, don't you think?) that is why I used the "short cut" of comparing to ERC, which I agree is not the best way. You may want to edit explaining further their political principles.

Mountolive 18:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo cup.png[edit]

Image:Logo cup.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move[edit]

Candidature seems like a mistranslation from Catalan and wouldn't be used in English so the article should probably be moved to Popular Unity Candidates. Valenciano (talk) 20:03, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I dont think no one will object: please proceed if you may, Valenciano. Mountolive _{group using a loop of another pop group} 14:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I object, however; a candidate is an individual seeking election. "Popular Unity Candidates" implies that each candidate is independent, but that they're together for convenience' sake. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe the Catalan does not have that connotation. A more accurate translation—assuming that 'candidacy' is out—would be 'slate' or even 'ticket'. Q·L·1968 ☿ 05:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'3rd party Citation needed' - why?[edit]

I'd like to query the need for 3rd party sources when describing formal positions of a political party/group. Surely when a statement refers to party policy, the party manifesto is an entirely legitimate source. Why would a 3rd party source be needed?

Changes I refer to: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Popular_Unity_Candidacy&type=revision&diff=690310377&oldid=689514250 - made by RJFF.

Tomclarke (talk) 16:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, party positions should always be described according to reliable, secondary sources. This is applied to each and every article, we don't make exceptions. If these positions are addressed in secondary sources is also an indicator for relevance. If these positions of CUP's are never discussed in secondary sources, this would suggest that they are not considered notable. Wikipedia – as an encyclopedia – is a tertiary source, it's content is generated by summarizing secondary sources, not by simply reciting primary sources. --RJFF (talk) 11:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Popular Unity Candidacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arran?[edit]

Arrian is not youth section of Popular Unity Candidacy. This party is organized in a different way to the other parties, and they do not have youth section. Anyway, Arran is part from Popular Unity Candidacy, but it's not their youth wing, so I will remove it. Happens the same with the student syndicate SEPC.

--Daniel Bond En: (talk) 22:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]