Talk:Port-Royal National Historic Site

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Nova Scotia Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Nova Scotia.

St.Johns settled in 1497? I'm not so sure. Yes Cabotto probably discovered Newfoundland in 1497 but he didnt found a colony.

I am not sure why the information on Port Royal after the habitation was put with this wiki article. I thought the location of port royal following the habitation was the site of present-day Annapolis Royal. Given this is a different location, I think the history of the "second" port royal should be put on the Port Royal, Annapolis County website to avoid confusion. Comments?--Hantsheroes (talk) 17:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Further, given the historical importance, I think the article "Port Royal, Annapolis County" should be changed back to "Port Royal, Nova Scotia" and the other port royal can be referred to under the heading. Not many people will know this important Port Royal is in Annapolis County. Comments?--Hantsheroes (talk) 17:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Port-Royal National Historic Site. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:07, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]