Talk:Port of Hull

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Maritime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Yorkshire C‑class Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Port of Hull is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 10 May 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Wood Pellet Facility[edit]

This article may be of use to expand the page. Also the BBC report on the new facility. Though neither give the actual dock which is been used for shipment. Keith D (talk) 21:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hull docks[edit]

I have ran into several references where the collective docks are referred to as (the) "Hull docks". I don't know if this is a local thing but I didn't see this mentioned in the article. Can someone let me know? Otr500 (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sentence wording.[edit]

The Town Docks subsection: Can someone explain something to me? The first paragraph states "By the mid 1700s the overcrowding of ships in the River Hull, or Old Harbour, had reached an {extant} that ships where being damaged,...". I am familiar with the word "extant" being used when referring to "still existing" or surviving from some point to the current, but not for meaning reaching a "point" or a current point (at the time) of existence. When I looked I did find a definition; "currently or actually existing <the most charming writer extant — G. W. Johnson>" so it would also mean "reached a point (of existence)" and still not sure if this is a better choice of words. I would appreciate some info on this. Otr500 (talk) 21:41, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a typo and probably should be extent. Keith D (talk) 22:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that would make more sense. So "had reached a point" would have been as good or even better. Otr500 (talk) 22:26, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Port of Hull. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Port of Hull. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error[edit]

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

—220.167.215.117 (talk) 01:13, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't explained what you think is wrong. The main coordinates in the article (those in the title position) appear to be correct, and I'm not seeing any obvious errors in the "Maps and landmark coordinates" section. If you think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 11:26, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]