Talk:Port of Ploče/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 07:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review update[edit]

I have nearly finished with my review, and am thus far satisfied with what I have read. The only problem is a potential one with the references. It appears that for all the references that link to the luka-ploce.hr website the connections all time out. Perhaps the website moved or was reorganized? Would you be able to investigate this? Thanks. --Tea with toast (話) 02:51, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just ran Checklinks and all links are reported as good (code 200, white background). Perhaps that server was down for some reason at the time. Could you please run Checklinks again?--Tomobe03 (talk) 08:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, they are fine now. It must have just been a server issue. --Tea with toast (話) 01:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Final review[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    I can't think of anything else you might do to improve the article, everything looks fine. Good work! --Tea with toast (話) 01:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]