Talk:Portuguese maritime exploration

Portugal Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

India: Kerala Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

Invention Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Invention, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Invention on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InventionWikipedia:WikiProject InventionTemplate:WikiProject InventionInvention articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Columbus mention[edit]

why there isn't any reference to Columbus? He was portuguese. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.246.22.38 (talk) 13:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Celestial Navigation[edit]

The article uses "celestial navigation" as one of its headings, yet it never actually goes into any detail. You just say that ships used this, this, and this when they were sailing and because the tools all used cosmic bodies you just used it as the heading. there needs to be detailed information on how celestial navigation occurred if you're going to use it as a heading. There is mention of the ephemerides,but you don't say anything about the quadrant, astrolabe, nocturnal, or any of the other instruments. Casini1 (talk) 15:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Theory of Portuguese in Australia[edit]

There is an entire page now devoted to the contentious topic of the Theory of Portuguese discovery of Australia. I'm of the view the 1520 and 1522 entries now listed here are pretty misleading, although they may appeal to nationalistic sentiment. I havent made any contributions to this page though, so am raising it as a courtesy before sticking my foot in.--Nickm57 (talk) 06:23, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Discovery of the Southern and Austral "Island of Gold", the "Land of Gold" by the expedition of Diogo Pacheco in 1520 is also described by the historian and chronicler Manuel de Faria e Sousa (1590-1649), as previously by Barros, chronicler and historian (1496-1570). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.113.163.75 (talk) 12:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So...are you going going to write an article on Pacheco? There is already a page on Manuel de Faria e Sousa Nickm57 (talk) 13:02, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nationalistic for Portugal or England? It's a petty the Lisbon great earthquake destroyed some very important documents that would put the matter to rest. On the other hand, one can always speculate how a proliferous maritime exploring nation reached Indonesia, Timor, Papua New Guinea, New Hebrides, criss crossing vast swathes of ocean and so on, but never looked southwards... Astonishing! CharlieCares (talk) 01:43, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portugal kingdom braganza.gif Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Portugal kingdom braganza.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Portugal kingdom braganza.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:16, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese monarchy[edit]

The inclusion of the template "Portuguese Monarchy" as the leading image of Portuguese discoveries makes no sense. That is why I have removed it once more. It would be perfectly all right in a text devoted to the Portuguese monarchy or royal family, but it is obviously not suited to this particular article or to any other not directly concerned with the subject. As is the addition strongly looks like a political POV. Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:52, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But also if it makes no sense then there may not be an explanation for why the royal family may or may not have made a diary. If the royal family may have then we have not found it by now, obviously. But if they did not then we have no chance of finding proof besides the artifacts that something we assume may have happened. So there for we do not know how much we are missing or if the royal family AFTER PRINCE HENRY THE NAVIIGATOR wrote a diary or not that contains the current event of that century or time period. - User:24.127.149.180, 22:06, 7 January 2013

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Portuguese discoveries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is all this nonsense?[edit]

"Discoveries"? I am pretty sure everything mentioned in that section was already known about, for thousands of years. I have renamed it "maritime exploration".
Where are the scientific, medical, astronomical discoveries? THe page was too general a title for the content, whcih was ALL maritime.
Similarly, though there is a period known as The Age of Discovery, it was also known as The Age of Exploration and The Early Modern Period.
If I visit a page on "Country X's Discoveries", I would expect to find ALL their discoveries listed there, not just the maritime ones from some small period of history. Chaosdruid (talk) 22:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. Carlstak (talk) 00:56, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]